| Wednesday, 20-Aug-2008 09:39:51 GMT | Tell a friend |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
In most monotheistic religions, God is described as omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and all-loving (omni-benevolent?). This definition, however, brings up the problem of evil, in that if God is omnipotent and all-loving, then why does He allow evil and tragedy to exist? Resolving this issue is a major part of the theology of the monotheistic religions; attempts to reconcile God's goodness with the fact that evil exists is termed theodicy.
Between people of different faiths, or indeed even between people of the same faith, the term "omnipotent" has been used to connote a number of different positions. These positions include:
Some monotheists reject altogether the view that God is omnipotent. In Unitarian-Universalism, much of Conservative and Reform Judaism, and some liberal wings of Protestant Christianity, God is said to act in the world through persuasion, and not by coercion. God makes Himself manifest in the world through inspiration and the creation of possibility, but not by miracles or violations of the laws of nature. The most popular works espousing this point are from Harold Kushner (in Judaism). This is the view that also was developed independently by Albert North Whitehead[?] and Charles Hartshorne[?], in the theological system known as process theology.
Belief that God can do absolutely anything can lead to certain logical paradoxes (which are not problematic, if God can rewrite the laws of logic). A simple example, described more detail under omnipotence paradox is: Can God create a stone so heavy that he cannot lift it?
Combining omnipotence with omniscience into one paradox, one might ask whether God can pose a question to which He wouldn't know the answer.
Send this page |
|
|||||||
This online educational article is provided by contributions of Wikimedia Foundation. Partners: Digital Gadgets | Logo Design | Business Articles | Online Calculators | |||||||