| Friday, 21-Nov-2008 22:27:48 GMT | Tell a friend |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
The reasoning of the court was based on the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech, which was held to override a state's interest in protecting public figures from intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The chain of events leading to this case is described in the article on Jerry Falwell.
Send this page |
|
|||||||
This online educational article is provided by contributions of Wikimedia Foundation. Partners: Digital Gadgets | Logo Design | Business Articles | Online Calculators | |||||||